Notice: Function amp_is_available was called incorrectly. `amp_is_available()` (or `amp_is_request()`, formerly `is_amp_endpoint()`) was called too early and so it will not work properly. WordPress is currently doing the `amp_init` hook. Calling this function before the `wp` action means it will not have access to `WP_Query` and the queried object to determine if it is an AMP response, thus neither the `amp_skip_post()` filter nor the AMP enabled toggle will be considered. It appears the plugin with slug `schema-and-structured-data-for-wp` is responsible; please contact the author. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 2.0.0.) in /home/u885321871/domains/fintechinshorts.com/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: Function amp_is_available was called incorrectly. `amp_is_available()` (or `amp_is_request()`, formerly `is_amp_endpoint()`) was called too early and so it will not work properly. WordPress is currently doing the `amp_init` hook. Calling this function before the `wp` action means it will not have access to `WP_Query` and the queried object to determine if it is an AMP response, thus neither the `amp_skip_post()` filter nor the AMP enabled toggle will be considered. It appears the plugin with slug `schema-and-structured-data-for-wp` is responsible; please contact the author. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 2.0.0.) in /home/u885321871/domains/fintechinshorts.com/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: Function amp_is_available was called incorrectly. `amp_is_available()` (or `amp_is_request()`, formerly `is_amp_endpoint()`) was called too early and so it will not work properly. WordPress is currently doing the `init` hook. Calling this function before the `wp` action means it will not have access to `WP_Query` and the queried object to determine if it is an AMP response, thus neither the `amp_skip_post()` filter nor the AMP enabled toggle will be considered. It appears the plugin with slug `schema-and-structured-data-for-wp` is responsible; please contact the author. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 2.0.0.) in /home/u885321871/domains/fintechinshorts.com/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: Function amp_is_available was called incorrectly. `amp_is_available()` (or `amp_is_request()`, formerly `is_amp_endpoint()`) was called too early and so it will not work properly. WordPress is currently doing the `init` hook. Calling this function before the `wp` action means it will not have access to `WP_Query` and the queried object to determine if it is an AMP response, thus neither the `amp_skip_post()` filter nor the AMP enabled toggle will be considered. It appears the plugin with slug `schema-and-structured-data-for-wp` is responsible; please contact the author. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 2.0.0.) in /home/u885321871/domains/fintechinshorts.com/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
The FTC is setting its sights on generative AI | Fintech InShorts: Latest fintech news, analysis by experts
Monday, December 23, 2024

The FTC is setting its sights on generative AI

Watershed technological transitions can usher in opportunities for new entrants to challenge market leaders. These rare paradigm shifts redefine how companies compete for customers and resources. The emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is a quintessential example of how innovation can either disrupt or entrench dominant incumbents depending on how markets and regulators respond.

Generative AI uses massive models trained on rich and diverse datasets to create new content. This revolutionary tool is reshaping how businesses interact with their customers, competitors, and partners, creating immense opportunity and great risk.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is making a case for aggressive antitrust enforcement. A recent Technology Blog submission from the Bureau of Competition and Office of Technology staff outlines several practices that could trigger government intervention. To understand antitrust risk when competing in markets affecting generative AI, businesses should familiarize themselves with the parameters and limits of several common antitrust theories of harm.

Exclusive dealing

Companies often seek to shore up suppliers or customers through exclusive deals. Exclusive dealing is not necessarily problematic and often stimulates competition. But agreements that enable one firm to control a critical input, distribution channel, or customer segment can raise concerns. In McWane v. FTC, for example, a federal court condemned an exclusive-dealing arrangement that foreclosed rivals from “distribution sufficient to achieve efficient scale, thereby raising costs and slowing or preventing effective entry.”

Generative AI startups should familiarize themselves with the parameters and limits of several common antitrust theories of harm.

In the context of generative AI, the FTC foresees antitrust exposure where “incumbents that offer both compute services and generative AI products” wield such arrangements to discriminate against new entrants. The FTC appears poised to scrutinize exclusive deals involving compute resources, such as graphical processing units, that are key to competing for generative AI markets.

Although each agreement requires an individualized assessment, several general principles are worth knowing. First, exclusive-dealing arrangements should not be implemented as part of a scheme to exclude or deny rivals the ability to compete. Exclusive-dealing contracts that block competitors from scaling are inherently risky.

Second, companies should contemporaneously document any pro-competitive benefits, such as lower costs, higher quality, and better access to products, and should be prepared to explain specifically how the exclusivity results in improved products or services. Finally, be aware that exclusive arrangements with companies whose market share exceeds 30% are riskier.

source

Hot this week

Banking as a Service: Meaning, Examples, Benefits and Future

The push for open banking has led to a...

Best fintech blogs and websites

Fintech (financial technology) has been an interesting part of...

What is Fintech?

Fintech: A term used to refer to innovations in...

How to buy shares online

Buying shares online in India has come a long...

Is it worth investing in life insurance over 60?

Is it worth investing in life insurance over 60? As...

Singapore-based fintech start-up WSPN bags $30m seed funding

WSPN (Worldwide Stablecoin Payment Network), a Singapore-based stablecoin...

Mastercard set to lay off around 3% of global workforce

Mastercard plans to cut around 3% of its...

HSBC reportedly considering sale of its South African business

HSBC Holdings is reportedly considering selling its South...

USAA president and CEO Wayne Peacock to retire in 2025

Wayne Peacock, President and CEO of USAA, plans...

Singapore’s Valverde taps Broadridge for investment management solution

Valverde Investment Partners, a new Singapore-based investment firm...

US fintech Amount lands $30m in fresh funding to advance AI capabilities

Funding Round: Amount, a digital origination and decisioning...

Sharon Naidoo named new TransUnion CFO for the UK and Europe

Appointment: Sharon Naidoo has been appointed as the...

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img